skip to content
Site header image reelikklemind

🎥 Environmentalism was a mistake: Nausicaä and nature

🌲 Evergreen 🎥 Video

🎥 Environmentalism was a mistake: Nausicaä and nature


Introduction

In this groundbreaking video essay from The Emotional Ecologist, we are taken on an intellectual journey that challenges decades of conventional wisdom about Hayao Miyazaki's environmental masterpiece, "Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind." The video presents a compelling thesis that fundamentally reshapes our understanding of this foundational work in both anime history and environmental discourse.

Through meticulous analysis of both the 1984 film and the expansive manga series (1982-1994), the creator argues that traditional interpretations of Nausicaä as a straightforward environmentalist allegory represent a fundamental misunderstanding of Miyazaki's evolving philosophical vision.

You can read the original emotional ecologist manuscript here.


Methodology and Approach

The video essayist employs a comprehensive analytical framework, drawing from multiple sources to construct their argument:

  1. Comparative Analysis: A detailed examination of both the anime adaptation and the original manga, highlighting significant thematic differences
  2. Primary Source Research: Incorporation of Miyazaki's own words from interviews compiled in "Starting Point" and "Turning Point"
  3. Historical Context: Placement of Miyazaki's work within the broader context of 1980s environmental concerns and Japanese social issues
  4. Character Development Analysis: Close reading of character arcs and their symbolic significance
  5. Inter-textual Analysis: Connections to Miyazaki's later works and their environmental themes

This multi-faceted approach allows for a nuanced exploration that goes beyond surface-level interpretations to uncover the deeper philosophical currents running through Miyazaki's work.


Challenging Conventional Environmentalist Interpretations

The Traditional Reading

The video begins by acknowledging the dominant interpretation of Nausicaä: a straightforward environmentalist narrative where nature (represented by the toxic jungle) is a fragile, benevolent force that will restore Earth if protected from destructive humans. This reading, while accurate for the film adaptation, represents only a portion of Miyazaki's complete vision.

Miyazaki's Problem with Environmentalism

Central to the video's thesis is Miyazaki's stated discomfort with traditional environmentalist narratives. The creator quotes Miyazaki directly: "Isn't it the height of arrogance to keep showing nature as needing protection to keep it from disappearing? This is what I don't care for. Everyone depicts nature as being charming, but it is something more fearsome."

This perspective fundamentally challenges the anthropocentric view of nature as either a benevolent mother figure or a victim requiring human salvation. Instead, Miyazaki presents nature as possessing its own agency, power, and even antagonistic qualities that exist entirely independent of human intervention.


The Toxic Jungle: Beyond Binary Environmentalism

Nature as Anthropogenic Ecosystem

One of the video's most insightful contributions is its analysis of the toxic jungle as an "anthropogenic ecosystem" - a natural environment that has evolved in response to human pollution and influence. This concept transcends the traditional nature/culture binary, presenting a more complex reality where human and natural systems are inextricably intertwined.

The toxic jungle is neither entirely natural nor entirely artificial; it is both a product of human pollution and a natural evolutionary response. This duality allows Miyazaki to explore environmental relationships in terms that reflect the complexity of real-world ecological systems rather than simplified moral dichotomies.

The Sublime Nature of the Toxic Jungle

The video emphasizes how Miyazaki deliberately designed the toxic jungle to resist easy empathy. By using insects and fungi (creatures typically associated with fear and disgust) Miyazaki creates an ecosystem that challenges viewers to find beauty and value in forms that transcend conventional aesthetic preferences.

This choice serves a deeper philosophical purpose: it forces audiences to confront their own cultural biases about what constitutes "worthy" nature and to recognize that ecological value exists independently of human aesthetic judgment.


Character Analysis: Emotional Ecology in Action

Nausicaä as Emotional Ecologist

The video presents a compelling reinterpretation of Nausicaä herself, not merely as an environmentalist hero but as an "emotional ecologist" whose power stems from her ability to connect with both the outer natural world and her inner emotional landscape. Unlike other characters who seek to control or escape nature, Nausicaä navigates the relationship between human and natural systems through emotional intelligence and intuition.

The Shadow Self and Integration

Particularly insightful is the video's analysis of Nausicaä's relationship with her "shadow self" - the darker aspects of her personality that she must integrate to achieve true maturity. This psychological dimension is represented through her connection to the toxic jungle's most disturbing elements. The video argues that Nausicaä's strength comes not from rejecting darkness but from embracing it as an essential part of both nature and human psychology.

This interpretation is supported by powerful moments from the manga, including Nausicaä's violent outbursts, her confrontation with her own capacity for hatred, and her eventual acceptance of her full emotional spectrum. These elements, largely absent from the film adaptation, reveal a much more complex and psychologically nuanced protagonist.


The Anime vs. Manga Divide: A Philosophical Evolution

Simplification for the Screen

The video meticulously documents how the 1984 film adaptation represents a significant simplification of Miyazaki's vision. Constrained by the medium and runtime limitations, the film presents a more conventional environmentalist narrative where nature is fundamentally benevolent and human ignorance is the primary problem.

Miyazaki himself acknowledged this as a "regrettable mistake," noting that the film medium forced him to present a simplified version of his ideas that betrayed the complexity of his developing philosophy.

The Manga's Philosophical Depth

In contrast, the manga series allowed Miyazaki to fully explore his evolving thoughts about nature, humanity, and their interrelationship. The video highlights several key developments in the manga that fundamentally alter the work's philosophical orientation:

  1. Rejection of Purity: The manga explicitly rejects the idea of environmental purity, presenting it as a dangerous illusion that leads to dehumanization and destruction.
  2. Critique of Environmental Anti-Humanism: Through characters like the mummified shaman and the forest people, Miyazaki critiques environmentalist perspectives that value nature over human life.
  3. Complex Vision of Coexistence: Rather than presenting a simple solution to environmental problems, the manga embraces the complexity and ambiguity of human-nature relationships.


Miyazaki's Personal and Philosophical Journey

Abandoning Intellectual Ideologies

The video reveals how the creation of Nausicaä coincided with a significant philosophical shift in Miyazaki's personal development. During the manga's creation, Miyazaki abandoned several intellectual ideologies that had previously informed his work:

  1. Marxism: Miyazaki explicitly states that writing Nausicaä led him to abandon Marxist ideology, which he came to see as inadequate for addressing the complexity of human-nature relationships.
  2. Intellectualism: The creator documents Miyazaki's growing distrust of purely intellectual approaches to understanding and solving environmental problems.
  3. Idealism: Both political and environmental idealism are presented as potentially dangerous when they deny the complexity and ambiguity of real-world situations.

Embracing Emotional Wisdom

In place of these abandoned ideologies, Miyazaki embraced what the video calls "emotional wisdom"—a way of understanding the world that prioritizes feeling, intuition, and emotional connection over abstract intellectual frameworks. This shift is reflected in Nausicaä's character development, as she moves from idealistic purity to emotional maturity through the integration of her shadow self.


Legacy and Influence on Later Works

The video traces how the philosophical developments in the Nausicaä manga laid the groundwork for Miyazaki's later masterworks:

Princess Mononoke (1997)

The video argues that "Princess Mononoke" represents Miyazaki's successful attempt to correct the mistakes of the Nausicaä film by presenting a truly ambivalent vision of human-nature relationships. Unlike the film version of Nausicaä, "Princess Mononoke" refuses to present easy answers or moral clarity, instead embracing the complexity and ambiguity that Miyazaki explored in the manga.

Spirited Away (2001)

While less explicitly environmental, "Spirited Away" continues Miyazaki's focus on emotional growth and the rejection of comfort and denial as insidious forces. The video draws parallels between Chihiro's journey and Nausicaä's psychological development, particularly in terms of confronting darkness and achieving maturity through emotional integration.


Critical Analysis and Evaluation

Strengths of the Video Essay

  1. Thorough Research: The creator demonstrates impressive familiarity with both primary and secondary sources, including Miyazaki's own words and the complete Nausicaä manga series.
  2. Nuanced Argument: The thesis is sophisticated and multi-layered, avoiding simplistic either/or propositions in favor of a more complex understanding of Miyazaki's evolving philosophy.
  3. Historical Context: The video effectively places Miyazaki's work within the context of 1980s environmentalism and Japanese social issues, providing important background for understanding his artistic choices.
  4. Textual Evidence: The argument is consistently supported by specific examples from both the anime and manga, as well as direct quotes from Miyazaki.

Potential Limitations

  1. Accessibility: The video's academic approach and length may make it challenging for casual viewers or those unfamiliar with Miyazaki's complete body of work.
  2. Selective Focus: While comprehensive, the video necessarily focuses on specific aspects of Miyazaki's philosophy, potentially overlooking other relevant perspectives or interpretations.
  3. Assumption of Familiarity: The analysis assumes viewers have detailed knowledge of both the film and manga versions, which may not be the case for all audience members.


Conclusion and Implications

This video essay represents a significant contribution to our understanding of Hayao Miyazaki's work and environmental discourse more broadly. By challenging conventional interpretations and revealing the complex philosophical evolution that occurred during the creation of Nausicaä, the creator invites us to reconsider not only how we understand Miyazaki's films but also how we approach environmental thinking itself.

The video's central insight is that Miyazaki moved beyond traditional environmentalism to embrace a more complex, emotionally grounded understanding of human-nature relationships. In an era increasingly characterized by environmental anxiety and polarization, Miyazaki's vision offers a middle path that acknowledges both the beauty and danger of nature, both human responsibility and human limitation.

Ultimately, the video suggests that the true power of Nausicaä lies not in its environmental message but in its exploration of emotional growth and the integration of darkness and light, both within the human psyche and in our relationship with the natural world. This interpretation not only enriches our understanding of Miyazaki's masterpiece but also offers valuable insights for navigating the complex environmental challenges of our time.

As we face unprecedented ecological crises, Miyazaki's evolved vision of embracing complexity, rejecting purity, and finding wisdom in emotional connection, may prove more relevant and useful than the simplistic environmentalist narratives that continue to dominate popular discourse.

This video essay serves as both a brilliant work of film analysis and a timely contribution to how we think about our place in the natural world.

You can read the original emotional ecologist manuscript here.


Crepi il lupo! 🐺