"The most painful state of being is remembering the future, particularly the one you will never have." - Soren Kierkegaard
Context
To understand this quote, we need to examine several key aspects of Kierkegaard's existential philosophy:
1. The Nature of Despair
Kierkegaard defines despair not merely as sadness or hopelessness, but as a "developmental failure of the self." In his work The Sickness Unto Death, he explains that despair occurs when we fail to become the self we truly are meant to be - when we are "not willing to be the self which one truly is." This despair is the painful awareness of the gap between our actual self and our potential self.
2. Time and Eternity in Kierkegaard's Philosophy
Kierkegaard presents a complex view of time in The Concept of Anxiety. He distinguishes between:
- Temporal time: An infinite succession where "no moment is a present" - time constantly flows away
- Eternity: The true present, where all time is contained
He introduces the concept of "the moment" as that paradoxical point where "time and eternity touch each other" - what he calls "an atom of eternity" and "the first reflection of eternity in time."
3. The Problem of Absence from Oneself
In Either/Or, Kierkegaard identifies unhappiness as fundamentally being "absent from oneself." He explains that we can be absent in two ways:
- Through hope (living in the future)
- Through memory (living in the past)
The truly happy person, according to Kierkegaard, is "present to himself" in the current moment.
Detailed Analysis
The Paradox: "Remembering the Future"
The phrase "remembering the future" is deliberately paradoxical. Normally, we remember the past and anticipate the future. Kierkegaard uses this paradox to describe a specific psychological and existential state:
- It's a form of memory: Like memory, it involves a vivid, detailed contemplation of something that feels real and concrete
- But it's directed toward the future: Unlike normal memory, this mental activity is focused on what could be, not what was
This paradox captures the human capacity to imagine potential futures with such clarity and emotional investment that they feel as real as memories.
Why This State is "The Most Painful"
Kierkegaard identifies this as the most painful state of being for several interconnected reasons:
1. The Pain of Lost Potential
When we "remember the future," we are confronting the gap between what could be and what will be. We are vividly aware of possibilities, paths, and versions of ourselves that we will never actualize. As Kierkegaard explains, despair is fundamentally about the failure to become our true selves, and this state makes that failure acutely present.
2. The Double Absence
In his discussion of unhappiness, Kierkegaard explains that we can be absent from ourselves through hope (future-oriented) or memory (past-oriented). But "remembering the future you will never have" represents a double absence:
- You are absent from the present moment
- You are absent even from the legitimate future that could be yours
- Instead, you dwell in a future that is fundamentally unrealizable
3. The Awareness of Finitude
This state forces us to confront our fundamental limitations - that we cannot be all things, that every choice closes off other possibilities, that our time and energy are finite. As Kierkegaard notes, "the future in a certain sense signifies more than the present and the past, because in a certain sense the future is the whole of which the past is a part."
4. The Torment of Consciousness
What makes this state particularly painful is that it involves full consciousness of the loss. Unlike the person who unconsciously conforms to social expectations and avoids confronting their despair, the person who "remembers the future" is acutely aware of what they are missing. As Kierkegaard writes, "the despairing man who is unconscious of being in despair is, in comparison with him who is conscious of it, merely a negative step further from the truth."
The Existential Dimension
This quote captures a core existential insight about human freedom and limitation:
1. The Burden of Choice
Every choice we make eliminates countless other possibilities. When we "remember the future," we are confronting all the paths not taken, all the versions of ourselves that will never exist because of the choices we've made.
2. The Tension Between Freedom and Finitude
We are free to imagine infinite possibilities, but we are finite beings who can actualize only a tiny fraction of them. This tension between our infinite imagination and our finite existence is a primary source of existential anguish.
3. The Role of Imagination
Kierkegaard recognizes that human imagination allows us to inhabit potential futures with such intensity that they feel more real than our actual present. This imaginative capacity, while uniquely human, becomes a source of suffering when it fixates on what cannot be.
Connection to Kierkegaard's Broader Philosophy
This quote connects to several key themes in Kierkegaard's work:
1. The Three Spheres of Existence
- Aesthetic sphere: Characterized by immersion in immediate experiences and possibilities
- Ethical sphere: Characterized by commitment and choice
- Religious sphere: Characterized by faith and acceptance
The person "remembering the future" is trapped in the aesthetic sphere, endlessly contemplating possibilities without making the commitments that would lead to authentic existence.
2. The Concept of Anxiety
In The Concept of Anxiety, Kierkegaard explores how anxiety arises from our awareness of freedom and possibility. The state of "remembering the future" represents a heightened form of this anxiety - we are paralyzed by the awareness of all that we could be but will never become.
3. Authentic vs. Inauthentic Existence
The quote contrasts authentic existence (being present to oneself in the current moment) with inauthentic existence (dwelling in unrealized futures). For Kierkegaard, authentic existence requires embracing our finite condition and making meaningful commitments despite our limitations.
Contemporary Relevance
This quote remains profoundly relevant today:
1. The Age of Infinite Possibility
In our modern world with its unprecedented range of life choices and career paths, the awareness of "futures we will never have" is more acute than ever. Social media constantly exposes us to lives we could have lived, amplifying this sense of lost potential.
2. The Paradox of Choice
Psychological research has confirmed what Kierkegaard intuitively understood - that having more options often leads to greater anxiety and dissatisfaction, as we become more aware of what we're missing.
3. The Challenge of Presence
In our distraction-filled world, being truly present to ourselves and our current moment is increasingly difficult. We are constantly tempted to escape into fantasies of alternative futures, whether through entertainment, social media, or daydreaming.
Conclusion
Kierkegaard's quote captures a profound truth about human existence: that our capacity to imagine and hope for different futures, while uniquely human, becomes a source of intense suffering when we fixate on possibilities that cannot be realized. The pain comes not merely from loss, but from the vivid awareness of what could have been - the futures we can "remember" with such clarity that they feel more real than our actual lives.
This state represents the height of existential despair because it combines the full consciousness of our limitations with the tormenting awareness of our infinite potential. It is the pain of being caught between the finite beings we are and the infinite possibilities we can imagine - between time and eternity, between actuality and potentiality, between what we are and what we know we could never become.
For Kierkegaard, the antidote to this painful state is not to stop imagining or hoping, but to find the courage to be present to ourselves in the current moment, to make authentic commitments, and to embrace our finite condition with faith and acceptance.
Crepi il lupo! 🐺